Menu
News and Events
Baku State University has implemented assessment tools to evaluate sustainability literacy and SDG knowledge across the entire university community, including academic staff, professional staff, and students.
Institutional Sustainability Literacy Assessment
The university conducts a comprehensive sustainability literacy survey designed to measure understanding, awareness, and engagement with sustainability concepts. This survey includes:
-
Students (undergraduate and graduate)
-
Academic staff (faculty members)
-
Professional staff (administrative and support personnel)
The survey evaluates knowledge of environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Its goal is to identify knowledge gaps and opportunities for enhancing literacy, promoting awareness, and fostering active participation in SDG-related initiatives.
Survey link:
SDG Knowledge Assessment Tools
To complement the survey, the university encourages participation in the SDG quiz by Times Higher Education, which evaluates knowledge of global sustainability challenges and SDG-related concepts for students and staff alike.
SDG Quiz link:
Supporting Resources
Baku State University also provides curated resources and tools to enhance sustainability literacy, available on its SDG platform:
-
Useful links on sustainability: https://sdg.bsu.edu.az/useful-links
-
Surveys and assessments: https://sdg.bsu.edu.az/surveys
These assessments help the university:
-
Monitor sustainability literacy and SDG knowledge among students, academic staff, and professional staff
-
Identify gaps to inform targeted training and awareness programs
-
Strengthen active participation in SDG-related initiatives across the university
-
Embed sustainability principles into institutional culture and decision-making
By systematically assessing students, faculty, and staff, Baku State University ensures a holistic understanding of sustainability literacy and drives continuous improvement in sustainability education and engagement.
To evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and engagement of both staff and students regarding sustainability and the institution’s sustainability initiatives. This helps in tailoring training, awareness campaigns, and curriculum integration.
Assessment Domains
|
Domain |
Staff Focus |
Student Focus |
Suggested Assessment Type |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Environmental Literacy |
Understanding environmental issues, climate change, resource management |
Understanding environmental issues, climate change, energy & waste management |
MCQs, Likert scale, scenario-based |
|
Social Sustainability Awareness |
Equity, diversity, inclusion, labor rights |
Equity, diversity, inclusion, social responsibility, community engagement |
Likert scale, reflection, open-ended |
|
Economic Sustainability Knowledge |
Sustainable economic practices, circular economy, green finance |
Sustainable consumption, resource efficiency, eco-friendly practices |
MCQs, scenario-based, Likert scale |
|
Institutional Sustainability Awareness |
Knowledge of university policies, programs, climate action plans |
Awareness of campus sustainability initiatives, student programs, clubs |
MCQs, Likert scale, open-ended |
|
Personal Engagement & Behavior |
Participation in sustainability initiatives, daily sustainable actions |
Participation in initiatives, sustainable lifestyle choices, activism |
Likert scale, scenario-based, reflection |
Assessment Methods
-
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) – Test factual knowledge.
Example: “Which energy source is renewable?” -
Likert Scale (1–5) – Measure awareness, attitudes, and self-reported behaviors.
Example: “I actively participate in campus sustainability programs.” -
Scenario-Based Questions – Evaluate practical application and decision-making.
Example: “You notice excessive paper use in your department/class. How would you reduce it?” -
Open-Ended/Reflection Questions – Capture ideas, engagement, and personal action.
Example: “Describe one sustainable action you’ve taken in the past month.”
Scoring & Evaluation Grid
|
Domain |
Max Score |
Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
|
Environmental Literacy |
10 |
0–3 Low, 4–7 Moderate, 8–10 High |
|
Social Awareness |
10 |
0–3 Low, 4–7 Moderate, 8–10 High |
|
Economic Knowledge |
10 |
0–3 Low, 4–7 Moderate, 8–10 High |
|
Institutional Awareness |
10 |
0–3 Low, 4–7 Moderate, 8–10 High |
|
Personal Engagement |
10 |
0–3 Low, 4–7 Moderate, 8–10 High |
|
Total |
50 |
0–15 Low, 16–35 Moderate, 36–50 High |
Analysis of Results
-
Aggregate Scores:
-
By domain, department/faculty, and staff/student category.
-
Identify strengths and gaps in sustainability literacy.
-
-
Trend Analysis:
-
Compare year-on-year results to monitor progress and improvement.
-
-
Behavior vs Knowledge:
-
Compare awareness scores with self-reported behaviors to identify engagement gaps.
-
-
Institutional Insights:
-
Identify whether staff/students are aware of policies and programs, and how that relates to their behavior.
-
Action Planning & Recommendations
Based on the last analysis, we created targeted interventions:
|
Gap Identified |
Action |
Responsible Unit |
Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Low environmental literacy |
Mandatory training modules, online workshops |
HR & Sustainability Office |
3–6 months |
|
Weak personal engagement |
Sustainability challenges, gamified initiatives, recognition programs |
Student Affairs & Staff Committees |
3–12 months |
|
Low awareness of policies |
Awareness campaigns, seminars, newsletters |
Communications & Sustainability Office |
1–3 months |
|
Knowledge-behavior gap |
Behavioral nudges (energy-saving campaigns, waste reduction signage) |
Facilities & Sustainability Office |
Ongoing |
|
Department-specific gaps |
Targeted departmental workshops and mentoring |
Department Heads & Sustainability Office |
3–6 months |